Showing posts with label Eca de Queiros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eca de Queiros. Show all posts

Friday, June 13, 2008

The Relic summary

All of the posts related to The Relic are listed below, and I'll repeat the closing of the last post:

The Relic combines comedy, romance, and satire in a bawdy picaresque tale. Even with all the spoilers in these posts, I highly recommend this unique work and author. It is a true pleasure to read and savor.

Online resources for Eça de Queirós

An introductory post to the book and where it can be found

The Relic discussion: Chapters 1 - 2
The Relic discussion: Chapter 3
The Relic discussion: Chapters 4 - 5

The Relic discussion: Chapters 4 – 5

The last two chapters return us to Teodorico’s waking life, following him home from the Holy Lands. After being carried back in time, Teodorico finds that he is indifferent and weary of the shrines and sights. The languor of soul is serious: “I did not even feel interested in the pretty Jewish girls” of Nazareth. This is not the libertine we have gotten to know! While he sometimes feels “a faint, delicious nostalgia for the remote past,” his real incentive now is to return home and worm his way into his aunt’s good graces (and of course, her will).

Teodorico takes great care in packing the many relics he has obtained, especially focusing on the crate holding the alleged crown of thorns (sealed with nails from Noah’s ark, of course). His companion, Topsius, settles Teodorico’s nerves regarding the claim that he has the crown of thorns. “The value of relics, Dom Raposo, lies not in their authenticity but in the faith that they inspire.” Unstated is that the faith lies in the holder’s belief that they are authentic. Contrasts between Teodorico’s actions and the historical nature of the Holy Lands abound, and his stay ends with one of the more ironical comparisons during his visit to the Garden of Gethsemane. Instead of retreating there to pray, he daydreams about his aunt’s death and spending his inheritance. With Eça there is little surprise with intended plot twists, so when Teodorico gives what he thinks is Mary’s nightdress to a woman as an act of charity, the reader can be pretty sure where this is headed. As he leaves Jaffa he is temporarily moved by a longing for the Holy Lands. But even though his plans are dashed when he finds out that Mary has run off with another man, we see our beloved Teodorico return to normal—he plans to defile a nun. He rationalizes this as true love, but seasickness quickly overtakes him and she is spared. Upon reaching Alexandria, he spends “the brief night in a street of delights. Go there, my compatriots, if you want to know the rough pleasures of the Orient.”

Upon returning to Lisbon, Teodorico feels a new respect from people who know about his trip. He feels he “could speak with equal authority at the Geographical Society and at Benta Bexigosa’s bawdyhouse.” The tales he tells his aunt and family friends about his holy journey are laughable in contrast to what he actually experienced. His hopes go higher as he learns of his aunt’s failing health. Eça plays up the unveiling of relics a little too much, but meanwhile Teodorico prays earnestly (for a change) about his aunt: “Oh holy Virgin Mary, let her die soon.” He even thinks he may have to resort to violence to hasten her end. But then the moment comes as expected:

      The final nail was removed from the final plank to reveal the white layer of cotton wool. With tender reverence I removed it and, before their ecstatic eyes, I lifted out the sacred package wrapped in brown paper and tied with red ribbon.

      “Oh, what a perfume! I feel quite faint!” sighed Auntie swooning with saintly pleasure, the whites of her eyes showing above the black lenses of her glasses.

      I stood up, flushed with pride: “Given her great virtue, it should be left to my aunt to unwrap the package.”

      Rousing herself from her languor, still tremulous and pale, but with the grave demeanour of a pontiff, Auntie took up the package, bowed to the saints, placed it on the altar and devoutly untied the knot in the red ribbon. Then with the solicitude of one who fears she might bruise a divine body, she undid the folds of brown paper one by one. A piece of white linen appeared. Auntie picked it up with the tips of her fingers, pulled it brusquely out and there on the altar amongst the saints, on the camellias, at the foot of the cross, lay the lace and ribbons of Mary’s nightdress!

      Yes, Mary’s nightdress, in all its glory and immodesty, still creased by my embraces, with ever fold redolent of sin! Mary’s nightdress! And pinned to it, clearly legible by the light of the candles, the note that went with the gift, written in large letters: “To my Teodorico, my brave little Portuguese lover, in memory of all the pleasures we enjoyed!” Signed “M.M.”

After being banished from the house, he discovers he had grabbed the trunk with the “minor relics” he had brought back for his friends. He realizes “The relics were money!”, but then that had always been his intent—to use them for inclusion in his aunt’s will. Teodorico is able to live extravagantly for a brief time by selling his relics (and manufacturing some new ones), but soon Portugal is swamped and the market dries up. His middleman earnestly complains to my delight: “It was you who ruined the business! The market’s overflowing. I can’t even sell one of Baby Jesus’ nappies, which always used to sell so well before.”

Teodorico’s aunt dies and he gets word that he is essentially disinherited. The church (or more accurately, several priests) get the bulk of her wealth. The reader can clearly see why the priests hung around the aunt’s house all those years, and it wasn’t just for spiritual guidance. After blaming religion for all his troubles, Teodorico has yet another dream. What appears to be Jesus, but ends up being Teodorico’s conscious, judges him and leads him to see his own hypocrisy—it’s narrated a little heavy-handed at times, but the transformation had to occur for Eça’s intended ending. The ironies pile up as he becomes a truthful man. He cuts his prayer off mid-sentence realizing he doesn’t believe in religion anymore. He ends up with a respectable career and a marriage with an amply dowried woman. He ends up buying the family house although everything he had originally hoped for ended up in the hands of a rapacious priest. But he now has an understanding of how things have happened, and how things could have been different if he had been even more audacious:

      Yes, when a sinful nightdress had appeared on the altar instead of a crown of thorns, I should have declared confidently:

      “There is the relic! I wanted to give you a surprise. It’s not the crown of thorns, it’s better than that! It’s the nightdress that belonged to May Magdalene. She gave it to me herself in the desert.” …

      And who would doubt it? … Aunt Patrocínio would have fallen upon my breast, calling me ‘her son and heir.’ And I would be rich! I would be beatified. My portrait would be hung in the sacristy of the cathedral. The Pope would telegraph me an apostolic blessing. …

      Thus would all my social ambitions have been satisfied. And show knows? Perhaps the intellectual ambitions I had caught from the learned Topsius would also have been satisfied. Because science, jealous of the triumph of faith, might well have claimed that nightdress belonging to Mary Magdalene for itself, as an archaeological document. It might well have illumined certain obscure points in the history of contemporary costume in the New Testament, the way nightdresses in Judaea were made in the first century, the industrial state of lacemaking in Syria under the Roman administration, the way the Semitic races did their hemming. …

      And I had lost it all. Why? Because for one moment, I lacked the ‘shameless heroism needed to tell a lie’, which, thanks to some universal illusion, is responsible for creating all sciences and all religions, whether it loudly strides the earth or merely lifts its eyes palely to Heaven.

Not much remains unscathed from the author’s finale. Eça seems to have no problem with the humanistic side of religion (or similarly the actual usefulness of academia) but decries what the institutions have developed into and how much they undermine the original intent of their existence. The last paragraph of the book harks back to the first dream Teodorico has of the devil lamenting the creation of yet another religion and the audacity it takes to found one.

The Relic combines comedy, romance, and satire in a bawdy picaresque tale. Even with all the spoilers in these posts, I highly recommend this unique work and author. It is a true pleasure to read and savor.

Monday, June 09, 2008

The Relic discussion: Chapter 3

And now for something completely different…

After enjoying the women and champagne at the end of Chapter 2, Teodorico is transported by dream back to the first century AD. Following Topsius on a whirlwind trip to Jerusalem, we are given a detailed view of the city and temple as it might have appeared at the time. Teodorico has not changed much in his dream since he is intoxicated by women, wishing to keep them company. Instead, Topsius makes sure he views Jesus’ trial and crucifixion. Teodorico gets involved in a plot to spirit away an (still alive) alive Jesus after the crucifixion, but the scheme unravels when Jesus dies before the planned escape.

The narration of the dream can be jarring at times. There are a few instances where some discordant notes can give the reader pause. The anachronisms (eyeglasses and cigarettes, for example) are minor and easy to brush off since it is a dream. More questions arise from the knowledge Teodorico shows in the dream—how is he aware of so much? Is it something he “knew” during his dream or did he acquire the knowledge later? The awareness of what subsequently happens after this Passover while actually experiencing it creates a tension regarding time. These questions and paradoxes are ultimately set aside by what he sees and experiences in the dream, not just the known events but a fleshing out of the atmosphere and politics surrounding them.

Why is this chapter in the book? I wish I could talk with the author and get his take. Since that’s not going to happen, I’ll make some guesses based on what struck me. One obvious point is the difference in the Holy Land “back then” and “today” (or at least the time of the tale). Teodorico describes the desolate area he visits but in the dream he marvels over the lushness and beauty in everything he sees. This contrast seems to serve as a metaphor for Queirós’ view of religion—that a once promising idea has been so debased and debauched that the original intent (and potential) has been forgotten. It’s not that things were always rosy regarding religion—the Muslim guards in Chapter 2 are replaced by the Romans used to keep the peace in the dream. (Not that the Romans were always fair, as detailed in the dream). Debates in the temple over arcane and meaningless points show one corruption of the basic message. The willingness to protect the whole (and more likely the self) by allowing the sacrifice of an individual calls into question the intention or motivation of those willing to throw others under the bus.

Some of the more powerful scenes in the dream pertain to Jesus’ humanity and his basic message. Queirós seems to have a respect for Jesus and his message but ultimately doesn’t appear to believe his holiness. The explanation of the empty tomb calls into question the very foundation of Christianity (at worst) and the focus of its message (at best). The author doesn’t pull any punches regarding Jesus himself, showing a decidedly different viewpoint on his treatment of the moneychangers in the temple.

The interesting observation for me is how different Teodorico acts during the dream. At first he behaves the same as in real life, not just in his desire for women but also the personal gain of being privy to what Jesus might say in his presence. But as the dream progresses he changes and shows a reverence and awe for what is happening. The difference is that what is happening in the dream is unadulterated. What Teodorico experiences in Lisbon when surrounded by his overly zealous aunt and her spiritual advisers has added a distance he must travel (and is unwilling to do so) to reach the heart of the religion. It may overdoing it in portraying the entire religion as based on legend, but it definitely gets Queirós point across as to the difference between the humanism of Jesus and the sham piety of Teodorico’s day. Some things are consistent between the two ages, whether it is the fake relics or the moeny to be made from someone else’s faith. But the differences, especially regarding what can be at stake, are even more striking.

I’m not sure if Queirós views that elevating Jesus’ humanism into a religion is the ultimate source of its corruption, but he does highlight the distance it traveled from the original intent. This is masterpiece of a very unique chapter. As Queirós commented early in the chapter about Jesus’ own actions, unintended consequences can undermine the intent of what is planned, which seems to be one theme of the entire book.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Relic discussion: Chapters 1 – 2

The Relic follows the outrageous antics of Teodorico Raposo in the quest to inherit his aunt’s riches. His mother died shortly after he was born while his father died when Teodorico was seven. He is sent to live with his rigidly pious (yet gullible) aunt, who puts him through school and graduate school. It is when earning his secondary degree that he discovers the sensuous and carnal pleasure in life (after his first overly-harsh instructor died). Teodorico starts his double life, enjoying himself while in school but having to appear as pious as his aunt while staying with her in Lisbon. Once he graduates from school, he has more freedom to pursue his baser interests.

And he does enjoy those freedoms. The only thing he enjoys more than the company of women is engaging in conspicuous piety around his aunt. Of course that is only to get in her good graces as he realizes the church is his competitor for her estate. The aunt possesses a hair-trigger temper that is unleashed at any perceived slight or slip in manners or morals. She incessantly rummages through the belongings of her nephew and the help in order to ensure no loose morals exist in her household. Even with more freedom to have fun, Teodorico lives in fear since a slip-up would not only disinherit him but cost him his freedom as well. His attempts to cover his amorous tracks include burning love letters as well as incense (to mask the perfume of his lover). Shortly after discovering Adélia, his lover, is deceiving him, his aunt orders Teodorico to go as her surrogate to the Holy Land. Her one request, after threatening to put him out on the street if she hears that he chases after women or gives in to temptation, is to bring her “some holy relic from one of those holy places, a miraculous relic that I may keep, that I can cleave to in my sufferings and that will cure me of my ills.” Considering Teodorico only saw salvation in the “friendly, feminine lands, full of fun” that he would have to cross in order to reach the Holy Lands, his task appears easier said than done.

As the journey starts with the book’s second chapter, the tone changes from toungue-in-cheek comedy (where we laugh at Teodorico) to a multi-level farce where it becomes easier to identify with him. Queirós remains a fairly detached narrator, but his choice of language (or at least in translation) betrays a humanism beneath the neutral judgments. We follow Teodorico to Alexandria with his traveling companion, Dr. Topsius. The esteemed German doctor, undertaking research for his upcoming books The History of the Herods and The History of the Ptolemies, is a colorful companion despite lapsing into erudite babble (as well as using Teodorico’s toothbrush). Teodorico makes a beeline past the nearest church in order to find “a woman to love.” Thus begins a torrid affair with Mary, an English glovemaker. Upon leaving for Jerusalem, the first relic is obtained:
     Rummaging amongst the tangled sheets, he [Alpedrinha, Teodorico’s servant] had found a long lace nightdress, with pale silk ribbons. He shook it and it exhaled a nostalgic scent of violets and love. Ah, it was Mary’s nightdress, still warm from my caresses!

      ‘It belongs to Miss Mary! It’s yours, my love!’ I moaned, doing up my braces.

     My little glovemaker got up, tremulous, white-faced, and made a final poetic, passionate gesture. She rolled up the nightdress and thrust it into my arms as ardently as if her very heart lay amongst its folds.

      ‘I give it to you, Teodorico! Take it, Teodorico! It still bears the traces of our love. Take it and sleep with it by your side, as if you were sleeping with me. But wait, wait one moment, my love! I just want to write a little something, a dedication!’

     She ran to the table, on which lay scraps of the sensible notepaper I used when I wrote to my aunt, retelling the edifying story of my fasts in Alexandria, of nights spent immersed in the Gospels. Clasping the perfumed nightdress in my arms, feeling two sad tears roll into my beard, I looked anxiously around for somewhere to store that precious relic of love. The trunks were all closed. The canvas bag was full to bursting.

     …But my dearly beloved was already waving a piece of paper, covered in the words she had written, in a hand as generous, impetuous and frank as her love: ‘To my Teodorico, my brave little Portuguese lover, in memory of all the pleasures we enjoyed!’

      ‘But darling, where am I going to put this? I can’t carry it in my arms, naked and uncovered.’

      Alpedrinha was already on his knees, frantically unbuckling the bag. Then Maricoquinhas [Mary’s nickname] had a delicate but inspired idea, she grabbed a piece of brown paper, picked up a length of red ribbon from the floor and her skilful glovemaker’s hands quickly made of the nightdress a neat, round, graceful parcel which I put under my arm, clutching it to me with jealous, fiery passion.

Lovesick and probably seasick, Teodorico stays below deck on the sail to Jaffa and has a religious dream. In the dream, he walks through the Holy Land with Adélia and Mary. They are later joined by the Devil in time to witness a fantastic version of the Ascension. The Devil is distraught: "Consummatum est, my friend! Another god! Another religion! And this one will propagate in Heaven and Earth alike an unspeakable tedium.” The Devil expounds on the joy of pre-Christian religions and the worst aspects of the new religion:

      But then this carpenter from Galilee had appeared and all that was done for. The human face became for ever pale and full of suffering; a dark cross, weighing down upon the earth, withered the splendour of the roses, drained kisses of their sweetness; this new god took pleasure in ugliness.

      Thinking that Lucifer had grown sad, I tried to console him: ‘Don’t worry, there’s still plenty of pride and prostitution, plenty of blood and anger in the world! Don’t bemoan the holocausts of Moloch. There will be holocausts of Jews one day.’ Stunned, he replied: ‘Me worry? What do I care one way or the other, Raposo? They are transient, I am not.’

It is difficult to read this today without a jolt in the accurate prediction of a holocaust. Immediately after this speech, Teodorico’s aunt appears in his dream. He feels frightened at the sight of her, something notably absent in his talk with the Devil. Part of the horror underlying his reaction is the fear of losing his inheritance. But even more so, I believe, is Queirós allowing Teodorico to speak for the author’s distaste in the aunt’s type of Christianity and preference for a humanist approach full of appreciation in the beauty around us.

Teodorico continues to Jerusalem and is vastly underwhelmed by what he finds. At dinner he becomes infatuated with a fellow traveler, Ruby. In his visit to the tomb of Jesus (one of the few religious tasks he carries out for his aunt), he looks for Ruby in the crowds instead of being moved by the religious symbolism around him. Queirós adds to the farce by pointing out the market available for knickknacks and fake relics, such as a cigar holder made from the wood of Noah’s ark. Later that evening, as Teodorico tries to spy on Ruby bathing, her father catches him and provides a sound thrashing. The next night provides an attempt at “sensual revelry” that farcically goes awry. None of the dancers are worth the money provided until the last dancer appears on stage. She is too frightened to do anything, so Teodorico tries to comfort her. He murmurs sweet nothings to her, including “girls like you are well-treated there [Lisbon], given respect, they get written up in the newspapers, they marry landowners…”. Queirós’ tongue must have been firmly held in cheek when writing that, and after reading The Maias I recognize his disdain for both the decay and hypocrisy in his homeland.

On a trip to the Jordan River and near the ruins of Jericho, Teodorico happens upon a tree he thinks provided the thorns for Jesus’ mocking crown. He hits on the idea to take a branch home to his aunt as the relic he promised her, but fears it may be authentic and heal her ailments (and postpone his inheritance). Teodorico tracks down Topsius who provides double relief by noting that the tree could not have provided the crown of thorns but volunteers to vouch for its authenticity to his aunt. Queirós gets another dig in on the ubiquitous market for fake relics and sets up the ending:

      ’That’s a fine branch you’ve got there!’ he [Potte, their guide in the Holy Lands] shouted. ‘Would you like it made into a crown? That way it could serve as a relic.’

      And then, with extraordinary dexterity, the excellent man wove the rough branch into the shape of a holy crown. And it looked so touchingly like the real crown of thorns! … He delicately wrapped the crown up in it [wool], as if it were a fragile jewel, then with a sheet of brown paper and some scarlet string, he made it into a round package, light, neat and compact.

Teodorico celebrates with champagne and women, then “(f)eeling calm and happy, I too fell asleep.” All along the trip, it is interesting to see Teodorico’s reactions to events—his first reaction is usually to consider doing something pious, but he decides not to follow through on it. The pious reaction is so ingrained in him by his aunt, as is his revulsion at the religion that stands between him and an inheritance, causing the dual nature between intent and action to happen again and again. After reverentially wading in the river Jordan, Teodorico decides to bathe in “that bucolic bathtub amongst the trees” while dreaming of Adélia. Likewise his pride in shouting “No one guides me but Christ our Lord” is ironic at best since the setting for the declaration is in a whorehouse. This distinction between thought and action is highlighted during the trip to the river Jordan as Topsius tells the story of Salome and John the Baptist. John literally loses his head because of a woman, while Teodorico is constantly (figuratively) losing his for any pretty woman he sees.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

The Relic

A quick post to introduce the book I'm currently reading: The Relic by Eça de Queirós. Since I enjoyed The Maias so much I wanted to dip into another work of his. Despite having the same title, don't confuse this with the 1997 horror movie.

Here is my post with some online resources on Eça de Queirós.

I'm reading the translation by Margaret Jull Costa published by Dedalus Books. I was able to find my copy through an online book reseller, but Dedalus also has the book in their current catalogue. An excerpt of the book can be read here (click on Sample Chapter).

The summary on the back of my copy:
Teodorico Raposo, the novel's anti-hero, is a master of deceit; one minute feigning devotion in front of his rich, pious aunt, in order to inherit her money, the next indulging in debauchery. Spurred on by the desire to please his aunt, and in order to get away from his unfaithful mistress, he embarks on a journey to the Holy Land in search of a holy relic. The resulting fiasco is a masterpiece of comic irony as religious bigotry and personal greed are mercilessly ridiculed.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

The Maias summary


A summary of the posts on The Maias by Eça de Queirós, as well as some additional notes.

José Maria Eça de Queirós online resources
The Maias: resources

The Maias discussion: Chapters 1 - 6
The Maias discussion: Chapters 7 - 10
The Maias discussion: Chapters 11 - 14
The Maias discussion: Chapters 15 - 18



Image of The Maias cover is from Wikipedia.

The Maias discussion: Chapters 15 – 18


Os Vencidos da Vida (Those Defeated by Life)
Eça de Queirós in front row with walking stick
Photo from www.arqnet.pt

The end of the book comes with mixed feelings: satisfaction from reading such a wonderful novel, dissatisfaction with many characters that cannot develop, and reevaluation of everything that has happened to date.

The generational differences are still highlighted, but the light comes from a different angle. The young poseurs still act immaturely, with little morality or ambition. But the older generation comes under harsher scrutiny. The reader begins to wonder if “the old days” are like a Homeric golden age, myths elevating people and events to a grander scale than really existed. Ega’s admiration of Alencar comes with the realization that talent has sunk so low that the poet “takes on the proportions of a genius and a man of justice.” When Afonso dies, the family administrator rattles off the wealth of one of Portugal’s richest families. Yet what else did he create? A son that killed himself and a grandson that effectively killed Afonso—not that he is responsible for their failings, but that his reputation as an “old lion” and his legacy appear to be superficial. Eça de Queirós demonstrates a marked disdain for Portuguese aristocratic society, some no doubt due to his personal circumstances, but he elevates the questioning to include the myths and the costs of past accomplishments of individuals as well as country. Even the incest angle seems to reflect on the moneyed class as a whole, a group that amorally poaches each other’s spouses within their tight circle instead of seeking normal relationships.

Fortunately not all the characters are disappointing. Minor characters like Cruges and Craft are shown actually completing endeavors, contributing something of value. Of the main characters, Maria Eduarda was easily the most likable and sympathetic. For someone that had been repeatedly given a raw deal, she succeeded on several levels. She declines her opportunity for instant wealth, choosing instead security for her and her daughter.

Fortunately the wry humor continues in this section, such as the events leading to Dâmaso’s exile or his marriage to a woman that cuckolds him. Even the running gags persist, such as the comments about the divan in Carlos’ office or the cheese pastries from Sintra. Echoes of previous events continue (Carlos giving Eusèbiozinho another beating, for example) but one such event helps sum up much of the book's trajectory. Upon Carlos’ return to Lisbon after more than nine years’ absence, he invites his friends to dinner, repeatedly telling them to be on time. This request echoes the family administrator being rushed to the meal table when we meet Carlos as a child because “the young master doesn’t like to be kept waiting.” Despite Carlos’ generosity of money and home to his friends (things he can easily give without making an effort), causing his friends to wait because he is late to the reunion dinner encapsulates his ultimate disregard of anything outside himself.

Toward the end of the epilogue chapter, Ega and Carlos discuss philosophies of life. The reader can be sure Ega believes only two parts: his statement that there was a futility in all effort, and that “We have failed in life, my friend!” (A nice reference in the latter—the pictures in this post are of Os vencidos da vida, or “those defeated by life”, a group of Portuguese intellectuals including Eça de Queirós with a highly ironic name for an accomplished group.) Carlos lays out a fatalism he purports to have as his guide: “Desire nothing and fear nothing…allow that piece of organized matter called the ‘I’ gradually to deteriorate and decompose…above all, have no appetites… .” Quite a far cry from the self-absorbed libertine who continued to sleep with his sister even after he knew of her origin, and it would be nice to believe he has achieved those beliefs. He has desired nothing in his life because there was nothing he could not obtain until he fell in love with Maria Eduarda. It is clear he desires nothing now since he rationalizes that being “the rich gentleman who lives well” (full of inoffensive, pleasant fun which is ultimately insignificant) suits him well. It is clear the appetites remain and his acceptance of what happens is limited to the distant past.

Ega is unconvincing in his philosophy as well (except for the previously mentioned statements) but then he has lived his life with "appearance and deceit" as his maxim. “And what are we, if not romantics?” exclaimed Ega. “What have we been since we were at school…? Romantics, which is to say, inferior individuals ruled in life by feelings and not by reason.” Which is true to a certain point. He has already ruled out relying on reason since he flippantly contradicts himself all the time. But there are only a couple of times you can be sure that Ega has felt anything: his heartbreak at having “lost” Raquel Cohen back to her husband and his friendship for Carlos. Beyond those things it is difficult to point to anything substantive that Ega has felt other than doing things for his enjoyment. To drive home that nothing has changed with these friends despite their comforting philosophies, at the very end of the novel we have Ega touting:
”If someone were to tell me that down there the fortune of a Rothschild or the imperial crown of Carlos V were just waiting for me, and that it could be mine if I ran to grab it, I wouldn’t so much as quicken my step. No! I would maintain this slow, prudent, proper step, which is the only pace at which one should walk anywhere in life.”
Carlos agrees: “It’s not worth making an effort or chasing furiously after anything.” Even if you wanted to believe them, all of this is said as the two are “racing desperately” after a tram to take them to their reunion dinner.


Os Vencidos da Vida (Those Defeated by Life)
Eça de Queirós sitting at table
Photo from www.vidaslusofonas.pt

Thursday, February 21, 2008

The Maias discussion: Chapters 11 – 14

The melodrama continues…

The plot of The Maias is rather thin, standard soap opera fare, but the richness of the telling is the reason to read the book. Not just the characters, but 1880s Portugal comes to life. The relationships between the male characters develop and seem truer to life than most novels. Rarely do I feel like condemning the immature or horrid acts of the characters as Eça de Queirós has presented them completely, not just a caricature. Also, even though he telegraphs major plot developments, getting there is most of the enjoyment. So a few notes on that enjoyment…

The echoing or doubling of action continues to surface. Just a few of the examples:

  • Maria Eduarda’s acts of charity, compared to that of Maria Monforte as well as Afonso,
  • Carlos stumbling upon Miss Sara having sex with a farm laborer while he is going to his tryst with Maria Eduarda (and of course the irony of his condemnation and hypocrisy of his rationalization). The additional irony is Maria Eduarda’s evaluation of Sara’s attitude toward Portugal: “Oh, she loathes it already! It’s too hot and smelly, the people are hideous…oh, and she goes in fear of being insulted in the street…In short, she’s miserable and can’t wait to leave.”
  • Carlos’ affair with the Countess unraveling as compared to Ega’s embarrassment with Raquel Cohen,
  • Maria Eduarda’s love of order in her house, even though her personal life hides a deep disorder.

One metaphor that appears several times in Chapter 14 has to do with mud:

“If,” he [Carlos] wrote to Ega, “she really has passed from you to Dâmaso, then you must act just as you would if your cigar had fallen in the mud; you can’t possibly pick it up and continue smoking it yourself; you should, therefore, simply allow the urchin who did pick it up to smoke it in peace; getting angry with the urchin or the cigar is quite simply imbecilic.”
Yet will he take his own advice when he finds out the marital status of Maria Eduarda, when it felt like it was “something very beautiful and lofty and resplendent having suddenly fallen and shattered in the mud, leaving him horribly splattered”?

Carlos may be partially progressing toward a maturity that he has so far lacked, yet he is like most of the moneyed class in Lisbon with his lack of accomplishments. The only achievements he can point to so far (in the book) is a college degree, his house refurbishments/decorations, and a couple of articles published. Listening to the upper class decry the low state of affairs in Portugal (the topic of the difficulty in finding good help at the Count’s dinner is just one hilarious example) while they do little to revive the state is both funny and pathetic. While there are limited examples of people trying to change things, most of the talk is empty rhetoric or bluster. Sousa Neto at the Count’s dinner is a prime example, showing his ignorance of literature even though he works in the Education Department. Not to mention his son is an undersecretary sent to St. Petersburg but doesn’t speak French, a decided handicap with Russia’s aristocracy.

(Sidenote: the wine references in the book definitely point out how well this class is living. Afonso gives six bottles of Ch. Margaux to Carlos’ first patient, while it isn’t uncommon to open a nice Chambertin or Champagne or Sauternes with dinner. Just a little detail, but helps illuminate that lifestyle.)

The idealism that is occasionally expressed is mixed with futility and defeat, helping explain the unbounded energy of many of the characters but the lack of focus in doing anything with it other than having affairs and living well. The feeling is that Portugal has peaked, its glory days with its colonies and importance in the world long past, while the slide into oblivion will have to be abated by someone else. Or somewhere else.

Lastly, two quotes that seem to underlie much of the action so far:

[Carlos] “The thing is, Craft, we never know whether what happens to us is, ultimately, good or bad.”

“Ordinarily speaking, it’s bad, said Craft tartly….”

and

[Dâmaso] “You know,” he said, “I have a feeling you’re going to turn out to be yet another scoundrel. One can’t trust anyone!”

[Carlos] “Everything in this world, Dâmaso, is mere appearance and deceit!”

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

The Maias discussion: Chapters 7 – 10

One thing that stood out for me in this section is the use of parallels or comparisons, where events echo a previous occurrence or current situation. Some examples:
  • Carlos’ first viewing of Maria Eduara Gomes echoes that of his father, Pedro, seeing Maria Monforte for the first time. Not only their reaction, but their language is the same with repeated usage of the word “goddess.”
  • The scandal Ega causes as his affair with Raquel Cohen is made public precedes and foreshadows the affair Carlos Maia begins with the Countess. Carlos’ trip to Sintra to try and ‘run into’ Maria Gomes is unproductive, as is traveling companion Cruges’ mission to bring home some cheese pastries for his mother.
  • There are even running gags throughout, with Carlos’ office couch the source of many jokes as to its real purpose (Ega—“I like this sofa. Made for love.” The Marquis ““tested its springs and said, with a wink: “Just the thing, eh, Carlos!” And later, the Countess sees it as “that soft, ample seat worthy of a seraglio.”)
  • The pimp Palma explains to Eusébio “the best way to treat Spanish women” (a sharp beating, followed by kindness), which is what happens when Cohen finds out about his wife’s infidelity with Ega (although Raquel isn't Spanish).
Generational differences and the decline of Portugal continue to be major themes. Everyone seems to have an idea of why everything around them is in decline, whether traceable to those in power or to the people themselves. Afonso views it as the latter, noting “We Portuguese will never be men of ideas because of our passion for form. … The thought may have been lost, but the beautiful phrase has been saved.” On several outings, the disrepair and dilapidation of many of the estates and houses are highlighted. Yet there are still some characters that defend Portugal and its potential while admitting to the decline the see around them. The easy mixture of different generations at Ramalhete shows some hope for the transition of generations, particularly when debate covers basic behavior, like when the Marquis argues with Craft:
“…conscience is merely a matter of upbringing. It’s something you acquire, like good manners. Suffering in silence because you’ve betrayed a friend is something you learn, just as you learn not to pick your nose in public. It’s all a matter of upbringing. Otherwise, conscience is just the fear of prison or of the big stick.”
Yet there are still troubling signs around the country such as the amount of soldiers present at the big race day. Were they there simply because the King was present or was it a sign of further unrest? However when juxtaposed with the amusing view of the Lisbon social scene at the race (pretentious at best, but mostly crude), the negative tones of the soldiers’ presence is minimized.

The mixture of the generations at Ramalhete also sets the stage for discussion on the arts and literature of the day, along with weaving in (then) current events and actual people in Europe. Alencar’s railing against modern literature manages to be both funny and sad. Also discussed are the protocols of having a successful affair (“He admires the wife and flatters the husband”). At times it seems that Lisbon is only populated by libertines and cuckolds. I think I can safely say The Maias is the 19th century book most open regarding sexuality that I’ve read so far.

Eça de Queirós’ style continues to be fun to read, although after a while the protracted set-up between Carlos and Maria Eduarda Gomes grows tiresome. Fortunately it is still enjoyable on all other counts.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

The Maias discussion: Chapters 1 – 6

Eça de Queirós’ novel is a chronicle of the Maia family and, to some extent, of Portugal in the 19th century. While I’m only a quarter of the way through the book, it reminds me of a Benito Pérez Galdós novel I’ve read (which is a good thing). The first six chapters give a quick history of the Maias down to Carlos Eduardo da Maia, following the family and Carlos through his graduation from University.

While there is a lot going on with the story, I’ll mainly focus on two major themes. One is the decline of Portugal on the world stage. Much is made of the country’s increasing irrelevance, not just with the world but even within the country. At almost every turn there is disappointment voiced over some failing of the government or its citizens. João da Ega, Carlos’ close friend, sums it up in one of his many diatribes:
“In that case,” said Ega, “if there aren’t enough women, we’ll have to import them, which is what usually happens in Portugal. Here we import everything. Ideas, laws, philosophies, theories, plots, aesthetics, sciences, style, industries, fashions, manners, jokes, everything arrives in crates by steamship. Civilisation comes at a very high price, what with the customs duties one has to pay, and, besides, it’s second-hand, it wasn’t made for us, and so it’s all a bit short in the sleeve. We imagine that we’re civilized in just the same way as the blacks in São Tomé imagine that they’re gentlemen, or even that they’re white, merely because they wear the boss’s old tailcoat over their loincloth. We’re nothing but a useless lazy rabble.”

Ega even condemns fellow countrymen for complimenting his unwritten book, simply because the praise is phrased in a manner he finds cloddish. While much of the blame for the decline is laid at the feet of 19th century history in Portugal (repeated foreign invasions, disintegrating empire, financial woes, etc.), another theme highlighting a generational conflict reinforces and complements the national slide. The tension is not an overt clash but a continual move away from traditional values, leaving each generation a little more unmoored and less grounded. It can be as simple as Pedro and Maria viewing Afonso as antiquated (“the world has moved on and left behind it the starchy attitudes of the sixteenth century”). Or it can be more complicated as reflected in the levels of accepted decadence. The financial bankruptcy of the government seems to be a symbol of the country’s moral bankruptcy.

Also feeding into this is the social stratification, with the moneyed and landed class free to pursue self-indulgence and cost is no object. With nothing to do and all the time to do it, the younger generation’s energy is unchanneled. They spout the most revolutionary rhetoric assuming that it possibly couldn’t happen or that, even if it did, they would not bear any of the costs. Afonso reflects the best of the older generation, strict but with a loving heart. Carlos, despite having everything provided by his grandfather, fails to pursue anything constructive beyond his initial flurries of interest. Eça de Queirós presents all of this non-judgmentally, letting the action speak for itself.

The blend of history and fiction yields a rich tapestry of late 19th-century Portugal. It doesn’t appear that the impending twists and turns will be much of a surprise since Eça de Queirós weakly hides or misdirects major items that will play a part later in the book (or so I’m guessing at this point). Yet it is still a wonderful read and highly recommended. I hope to post a list of characters and footnotes that will benefit those discovering this book.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

The Maias: resources

I started reading The Maias and quickly found myself lost during references to Portuguese history. I'm sure I will find more things I'm ignorant about, but for starters here are a few links that help make sense of the background events in the book:

Portuguese history: Fourth Dynasty (1640 - 1910) at Wikipedia

More detail at Wikipedia about The Liberal Wars (1828 - 1834)

A map of Portugal featuring regions and major cities

Update: Some helpful background can also be found in The Political History of Nineteenth Century Portugal. Also includes some description and discussion of Regenerationist movement.

Update 3 Oct 2011: Thanks to Amateur Reader for pointing to Michael Wood's review in the London Review of Books.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

José Maria Eça de Queirós online resources

I decided I needed a break from the Modernism kick I’ve been on and decided to read The Maias by José Maria Eça de Queirós. I wanted to find some resources online to flesh out what little I know about the book and the author.

Eça de Queirós Wikipedia entry

Projected Letters has an article on Rediscovering Queiroz
(Queiroz is how the author spelled his name, Queirós is the modern standard Portuguese spelling)

The Maias was recently translated by Margaret Jull Costa. Reviews for the book can be found in the following publications:

International Herald Tribune

The New York Times Sunday Book Review (what looks to be a summarized version of the review in IHT)

Words Without Borders

The new translation was released by New Directions Publishing