Translated from the Hungarian by Inez Kemenes
North Adams, Massachusetts: New Europe Books, 2012, paperback.
How to review a novel I greatly admired but didn’t necessarily click with? Instead of avoiding any write-up, as I did with Job by Joseph Roth, I’ll attempt to lay out both why I admired it and my problems with it. Published in Hungarian in 1941, Voyage to Kazohinia at first glance to be a (then) modern-day Gulliver’s Travels. The story begins with Gulliver, a British ship’s surgeon, volunteering to be transferred to the ship Invincible during the 1935 tensions between Britain and Italy over the Italian invasion of Ethiopia). While headed to Shanghai to protect British interests (including culture and civilization as well as trade), the Invincible is attacked and sunk somewhere in the Indian Ocean. Gulliver survives and washes up on the island of Kazonhinia.
Gulliver first encounters what looks to be the utopia of the Hins on Kaonhinia. Everything among the Hins is perfectly ordered. They teach Gulliver the language and the guiding concept of their society: kazo.
Kazo is pure reason that perceives with mathematical clarity, in a straight line, when and how it must act—so that the individual, through society, reaches the greatest possible well-being and comfort.The lack of “emotional resonance” is important—the Hins have no emotions. The basis for everything is objectivity, subjectivity does not exist. As Gulliver intuits early on, “behind this terrible perfection there was no substance.” (page 32) Everything is provided for in the Hins world. Food is available when you want and however much you want. You can work wherever you want, as long as it is kazo. Whoever needs something the most, such as shelter or clothing, determines who gets it. Many concepts we desire or enjoy—love, family, music, art, beauty—and societal tools—money, government, private property, stealing, character—don’t exist among the Hins. It’s an example of a perfect society, but it comes at the cost of its humanity. Or as Gulliver puts it later, “Life here does not take place, it only is.” (page 115)
That is, to be Kazo is to organize work, rest, sleep, sport, food, and our attitude toward our fellow human beings so we can produce the maximum possible, but without damaging our health through unnecessary strain. … We must not forget, kazo is not individualistic but communal in sense: what is not kazo for someone else is not kazo for me, either. … [M]ost remarkable, as we shall see later, kazo has no emotional resonance. (pages 44-45)
Here are a few of the substantive points on Hin society and Gulliver’s interaction with it that I found interesting:
- Kazo and its opposite, kazi (disharmony), are the only concepts among the Hins. Everything else is based on physical existence. This includes history—there is only the present.
- Education is highly utilitarian and stripped of taboos. Gulliver visits a class of children learning about the body—instead of studying diagrams, the kids are looking at dissected corpses.
- The Hins see Gulliver’s description of Britain as only a zero-sum game. There are winners and losers, but at no time (in their view) does society benefit from this arrangement. Because the concept of government is foreign to them, they even see crime and punishment equally—the only difference between the actions resides in the timing of the violence.
- The Hins view the goal of medicine as the eradication of pain instead of maintaining life, a very important difference in defining a successful outcome (especially if you’re the person about to be euthanized).
- Gulliver attempts to define and give examples of the human soul, what drives someone to create things or express themselves in certain ways. The Hins see this as an imbalance.
- While among the Hins Gulliver repeats British ideals over and over again, only to have the Hins fail to understand any of his points. At times the Hins reactions and arguments look ludicrous since they completely ignore non-physical concepts. The explanations and defenses raised by the Behins mimic Gulliver’s arguments because of their complete reliance on concepts (even though they are at odds with reality). Or to put it another way, Gulliver responds to the Hins with ideals while relying on common sense in response to the Behins. With this approach, Gulliver highlights the blurring of and contradictions between the two (ideals, common sense) . That his arguments to the Behins sound very much like arguments he heard from the Hins' rebuttals only adds to the humor.
- The importance of words is at odds in both societies. The Hins find words of little use beyond their utilitarian purpose—“a word is not reality” is a common refrain. With the Behins, though, words have no fixed meaning. At first it appears that Behin words mean the opposite of what we expect, but there are exceptions to that rule, then exceptions to the exceptions, and so on until it’s not worth trying to figure out what a word means. Except…it’s extremely important, possibly life or death, which purpose of the word is understood when used among the Behins.
- The absurdity of many of the Behin customs highlights the arbitrary nature of much of what we do. The rationality in their irrationality can be eerie at times such as in their forced degeneration of students, a logical step in trying to mold a model (irrational) citizen.
- The importance of concepts between the two societies stresses how they each view their place in the culture. I went into detail on the Hins only concept, that of kazo/kazi. While the Behins had many concepts, birku proves to be a central tenet. Gulliver, unable to receive a definition of birku, posits it was the unifying reason for every bad thing that happened to the Behins. In their view, bad outcomes were not related for their own stupidity or poor choices but to the arbitrary nature of bikru.
As for things that didn’t click for me about the novel, the most basic resides in not being a huge fan of utopian or dystopian literature. I know the “it’s not you, it’s me” defense is a poor excuse. Even with that hurdle to overcome, I found the novel engaging and many issues still relevant today. My main problem in the story occurs near the end when the Hins explain the Behins behavior as a genetic mutation. I found that jarring, mostly because it shows that the Hins do have a sense of history and the past isn’t imaginary to them. Granted it’s a concept they see as based on concrete evidence (or so I assume), but it still raises some inner contradictions.
After his rescue, Gulliver blithely carries on in his pre-wreck behavior, having learned nothing, a more active participant in the “dialogue of the deaf” than he realized. As Gulliver’s guide among the Hins points out, you never recognize that we don’t really see ourselves, individually or collectively, from within. We have to travel outside ourselves in order to understand. Fortunately Szathmári gives the reader plenty to contemplate in order to avoid Gulliver’s fate.
Publisher's reading group guide
Szathmári's Wikipedia page
Wikipedia page for the novel
Overview at Hungarian Literature Online
Excerpt from Chapter 4, also at Hungarian Literature Online
Videos from the book launch held in New York City, at the Consulate General of Hungary, on June 6, 2012:
- Francesco Crocco
- Actors Adam Boncz and Andrea Sooch read an excerpt
- Benjamin Hale
- Anna North
- Ralph Dumain
- Roundtable (on the structure of the novel)