Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If this is so, if to read a book as it should be read calls for the rarest qualities of imagination, insight, and judgment, you may perhaps conclude that literature is a very complex art and that it is unlikely that we shall be able, even after a lifetime of reading, to make any valuable contribution to its criticism. We must remain readers; we shall not put on the further glory that belongs to those rare beings who are also critics. But still we have our responsibilities as readers and even our importance. The standards we raise and the judgments we pass steal into the air and become part of the atmosphere which writers breathe as they work. An influence is created which tells upon them even if it never finds its way into print. And that influence, if it were well instructed, vigorous and individual and sincere, might be of great value now when criticism is necessarily in abeyance; when books pass in review like the procession of animals in a shooting gallery, and the critic has only one second in which to load and aim and shoot and may well be pardoned if he mistakes rabbits for tigers, eagles for barndoor fowls, or misses altogether and wastes his shot upon some peaceful cow grazing in a further field. If behind the erratic gunfire of the press the author felt that there was another kind of criticism, the opinion of people reading for the love of reading, slowly and unprofessionally, and judging with great sympathy and yet with great severity, might this not improve the quality of his work? And if by our means books were to become stronger, richer, and more varied, that would be an end worth reaching.
1 comment:
A few topics from these chapters that interested me:
Napoleon’s one hundred days (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterloo_Campaign for a good overview) was a whirlwind of activity and the impact had far-reaching consequences for much of the world. I thought Thackeray’s presentation of the events through the personal experiences was wonderful. I also enjoyed the focus being slightly away from the action, which allowed a panoramic view of the events.
The chase for Miss Crawley’s fortune is finally settled in one of the more amusing parts of the novel so far. The methods that different family members used to ingratiate themselves (or at least attempt to) into the good graces of such a woman was fun to watch.
I asked earlier about how others see Becky Sharp. I’m usually impressed with her ability to scheme and usually conquer her targets. I get very close to actually liking her despite everything, then she crosses another acceptable line of behavior and she distances herself yet again from me. The usual comparison for her is Amelia. What struck me the most in this section was how men react to both women, which was highlighted in Chapter 38 with the affection men reserve for Amelia. It’s interesting that both women provoke similar reactions in women, in particular married women.
So much of the book revolves around money, but I’ll limit myself to two quick comments highlighted in these chapters. Several chapters were devoted to how Becky and Rawdon were able to live on other people’s money and the devastation it caused many of their victims. Related is the ripple effect that bankruptcies caused. A great description in Chapter 37 spotlighted the “trickle down” effect that loss of consumers caused. Which begs the question for much of the book—how much of a country’s economy then was reliant upon both the megawealthy (think Vanderbilt, Carnegie, etc.) and maybe just as important was the number of people people living beyond their means.
Again, there is a lot covered in these chapters and I’ve only highlighted a few things. Feel free to add some things you enjoyed.
Post a Comment